Кибертанатология: за пределами смерти в цифровую эпоху
https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2025-10-1-80-94
Аннотация
Преобладание технологий и цифровых связей произвело революцию во всех аспектах социальной жизни людей, в том числе в смерти. Цифровые технологии меняют способы взаимодействия между живыми и мертвыми. Действительно, новые технологии не только внедряются в опыт ухода из жизни, смерти и скорби, но и меняют глобальный контекст, в котором происходят эти явления. И хотя сами взаимодействия между явлениями, связанными со смертью и технологиями, не являются чем-то новым, повсеместное присутствие цифровых пространств резко повысило их значимость и масштабы. Чтобы углубить и структурировать понимание этих взаимодействий, мы вводим понятие кибертанатологии как артикуляции смерти и всех связанных с ней явлений в цифровом пространстве. В свете этой концепции данная работа исследует топологию онлайн поведения, связанного со смертью, а также ряда сопутствующих явлений; рассматривает текущее состояние знаний об онлайн репрезентации смерти и скорби; определяет проблемы, с которыми придется столкнуться в будущем, чтобы оптимальным образом интегрировать понимание явлений, связанных со смертью, в более широкую область киберпсихологии. Развивая диалог между киберпсихологией и исследованиями смерти, кибертанатологические исследования не только приведут к теоретическим достижениям, но и будут способствовать получению практических знаний, которые помогут людям справиться со смертью и скорбью в современную технологическую эпоху.
Список литературы
1. Walter T. Communication Media and the Dead: From the Stone Age to Facebook1 // Mortality. 2015. Vol. 20, № 3. P. 215– 232. DOI: 10.1080/13576275.2014.993598.
2. Arnold M., Gibbs M., Kohn T. [et al.]. Death and Digital Media. New York: Routledge, 2018. 188 p. ISBN 978-1-138-91795-8.
3. Rheingold H. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1993. 304 р. ISBN 0-201-60870-7.
4. Wellman B., Guilia M. Virtual Communities as Communities // Communities in Cyberspace / Eds. P. Kollock, M. Smith. New York: Routledge, 1999. P. 167–193.
5. Roberts P., Vidal L. A. Perpetual Care in Cyberspace: A Portrait of Memorials on the Web // Omega — The Journal of Death and Dying. 2000. Vol. 40, № 4. P. 521–545. DOI: 10.2190/3BPT-UYJR-192R-U969.
6. Roberts P. Here Today and Cyberspace Tomorrow: Memorials and Bereavement Support on the Web // Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging. 2004. Vol. 28, № 2. P. 41–46.
7. Sofka C. J. Social Support ‘Internetworks’ Caskets for Sale, and More: Thanatology and the Information Superhighway // Death Studies. 1997. Vol. 21, № 6. P. 553–574. DOI: 10.1080/074811897201778.
8. Beaunoyer E., Hiracheta Torres L., Maessen L., Guitton M. J. Grieving in the Digital Era: Mapping Online Support for Grief and Bereavement // Patient Education and Counseling. 2020. Vol. 103, № 12. P. 2515–2524. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.013.
9. Beaunoyer E., Dupere S., Guitton M. J. COVID-19 and Digital Inequalities: Reciprocal Impacts and Mitigation Strategies // Computers in Human Behavior. 2020. Vol. 111. P. 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424.
10. Amy T., Doka K. A Call to Action: Facing the Shadow Pandemic of Complicated Forms of Grief // Omega — The Journal of Death and Dying. 2021. Vol. 83, № 1. P. 164–169. DOI: 10.1177/0030222821998464.
11. Nguyen M. H., Gruber J., Fuchs J., Marler W., Hunsa ker A., Hargittai E. Changes in Digital Communication During the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: Implications for Digital Inequality and Future Research // Social Media + Society. 2020. Vol. 6, № 3. P. 1–6. DOI: 10.1177/2056305120948255.
12. Nguyen M. H., Hargittai E., Marler W. Digital Inequality in Communication During a Time of Physical Distancing: The Case of COVID-19 // Computers in Human Behavior. 2021. Vol. 120. P. 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106717.
13. Guitton M. J. The Immersive Impact of Meta-Media in a Virtual World // Computers in Human Behavior. 2012. Vol. 28, № 2. P. 450–455. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.016.
14. Guitton M. J. Living in the Hutt Space: Immersive Process in the Star Wars Role- Play Community of Second Life // Computers in Human Behavior. 2012. Vol. 28, № 5. P. 1681–1691. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.006.
15. Guitton M. J. Swimming with Mermaids: Communication and Social Density in the Second Life Merfolk Community // Computers in Human Behavior. 2015. Vol. 48. P. 226–235. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.004.
16. Saramaki J., Leicht E. A., Lopez E., Roberts S. G. B., Reed-Tsochas F., Dunbar R. I. M. Persistence of Social Signatures in Human Communication // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014. Vol. 111, № 3. P. 942–947. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1308540110.
17. McLuhan M. Understanding Media: The Extension of Man. London: Routledge, 1964. 318 p. ISBN 978-0451627650.
18. German K., Drushel B. E. Introduction: Emerging Media: A View Downstream // The Ethics of Emerging Media: Information, Social Norms, and New Media Technology / Eds. B. E. Drushel, K. German. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011. P. 1–9.
19. Carroll B., Landry K. Logging On and Letting Out: Using Online Social Networks to Grieve and to Mourn // Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 2010. Vol. 30, № 5. P. 341–349. DOI: 10.1177/0270467610380006.
20. Barry E. From Epitaph to Obituary Death and Celebrity in Eighteenth-Century British Culture // International Journal of Cultural Studies. 2008. Vol. 11, № 3. P. 259–275. DOI: 10.1177/1367877908092584.
21. Walter T., Littlewood J., Pickering M. Death in the News: The Public Investigation of Private Emotion // Sociology. 1995. Vol. 29, № 4. P. 579–596. DOI: 10.1177/0038038595029004002.
22. Clark D. B. The Concept of Community: A Re-Examina tion // The Sociological Review. 1973. Vol. 21, № 3. P. 397–416. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1973.tb00230.x.
23. Hutchings T. Wiring Death: Dying, Grieving and Remembering on the Internet // Emotion, Identity and Death: Mortality Across Disciplines / Eds. D. Davies, C.-W. Park. New York: Routledge, 2012. P. 43–58.
24. De Vries B., Rutherford J. Memorializing Loved Ones on the World Wide Web // Omega – The Journal of Death and Dying. 2004. Vol. 49, № 1. P. 5–26. DOI: 10.2190/DR46-RU57-UY6P-NEWM.
25. Gibson M. Death and Mourning in Technologically Mediated Culture // Health Sociology Review. 2007. Vol. 16, № 5. P. 415–424. DOI: 10.5172/hesr.2007.16.5.415.
26. Walter T., Hourizi R., Moncur W., Pitsillides S. Does the Internet Change How We Die and Mourn? Overview and Analysis // Omega — The Journal of Death and Dying. 2012. Vol. 64, № 4. P. 275–302. DOI: 10.2190/OM.64.4.a.
27. Sas C., Schreiter M., Büscher M., Gamba F., Coman A. Futures of Digital Death: Past, Present and Charting Emerging Research Agenda // Death Studies. 2019. Vol. 43, № 7. P. 407– 413. DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2019.1647643.
28. Sofka C. J., Cupit I. N., Gilbert K. R. Preface // Dying, Death and Grief in an Online Universe: For Counselors and Educators / Eds. C. J. Sofka, I. N. Cupit, K. R. Gilbert. New York: Springer, 2012. P. xv–xvi.
29. Chapple H. S., Bouton B. L., Chow A. Y. M., Gilbert K. R., Kosminsky P., Moore J., Whiting P. P. The Body of Knowledge in Thanatology: An Outline // Death Studies. 2017. Vol. 41, № 2. P. 118–125. DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2016.1231000.
30. Baum F., Newman L., Biedrzycki K. Vicious Cycles: Digital Technologies and Determinants of Health in Australia // Health Promotion International. 2014. Vol. 29, № 2. P. 349–360. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/das062.
31. Obst K. L., Due C., Oxlad M., Middleton P. Men’s Grief Following Pregnancy Loss and Neonatal Loss: A Systematic Review and Emerging Theoretical Model // BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020. Vol. 20, № 1. P. 1–17. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2677-9.
32. Ward K. The Emergence of the Hybrid Community: Re-Thinking the Physical/ Virtual Dichotomy // Space and Culture. 1999. Vol. 2. № 4/5. P. 71–86. DOI: 10.1177/120633120000100405.
33. Gibson M. Grievable Lives: Avatars, Memorials, and Family ‘Plots’ in Second Life // Mortality. 2017. Vol. 22, № 3. P. 224–239. DOI: 10.1080/13576275.2016.1263941.
34. Park S., Hoffner C. A. Tweeting about Mental Health to Honor Carrie Fisher: How #InHonorOfCarrie Reinforced the Social Influence of Celebrity Advocacy // Computers in Human Behavior. 2020. Vol. 110. P. 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106353.
35. Bell J., Bailey L., Kennedy D. ‘We do it to keep him alive’: Bereaved Individuals’ Experiences of Online Suicide Memorials and Continuing Bonds // Mortality. 2015. Vol. 20, № 4. P. 375– 389. DOI: 10.1080/13576275.2015.1083693.
36. Brubaker J. R., Hayes G. R., Dourish P. Beyond the Grave: Facebook1 as a Site for the Expansion of Death and Mourning // The Information Society. 2013. Vol. 29, № 3. P. 152–163. DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2013.777300.
37. Gamba F. Coping with Loss: Mapping Digital Rituals for the Expression of Grief // Health Communication. 2018. Vol. 33, № 1. P. 78–84. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1242038.
38. Bassett D. J. Who Wants to Live Forever? Living, Dying and Grieving in Our Digital Society // Social Sciences. 2015. Vol. 4, № 4. P. 1127–1139. DOI: 10.3390/socsci4041127.
39. Cerrillo-i-Martнnez A. How Do We Provide the Digital Footprint with Eternal Rest? Some Criteria for Legislation Regulating Digital Wills // Computer Law & Security Report. 2018. Vol. 34, № 5. P. 1119–1130. DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2018.04.008.
40. Erdos D. Dead Ringers? Legal Persons and the Deceased in European Data Protection Law // Computer Law & Security Report. 2021. Vol. 40. P. 1–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105495.
41. Irwin M. D. Mourning 2.0 — Continuing Bonds Between the Living and the Dead on Facebook1 // Omega — The Journal of Death and Dying. 2015. Vol. 72, № 2. P. 119–150. DOI: 10.1177/0030222815574830.
42. DeGroot J. M. ‘For Whom the Bell Tolls’: Emotional Rubbernecking in Facebook1 Memorial Groups // Death Studies. 2014. Vol. 38, № 2. P. 79–84. DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2012.725450.
43. Knudsen B. T., Stage C. Online War Memorials: YouTube as a Democratic Space of Commemoration Exemplified Through Video Tributes to Fallen Danish Soldiers // Memory Studies. 2013. Vol. 6, № 4. P. 418–436. DOI: 10.1177/1750698012458309.
44. Cohen E. L., Hoffner C. Finding Meaning in a Celebrity’s Death: The Relationship Between Parasocial Attachment, Grief, and Sharing Educational Health Information Related to Robin Williams on Social Network Sites // Computers in Human Behavior. 2016. Vol. 65. P. 643–650. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.042.
45. Hoe-Lian Goh D., Sian Lee C. An Analysis of Tweets in Response to the Death of Michael Jackson // ASLIB Proceedings: New Information Perspectives. 2011. Vol. 63, № 5. P. 432–444. DOI: 10.1108/00012531111164941.
46. Beaunoyer E., Guitton M. J. When Popular Culture Phenomena Provide Experimental Grounds for Science: The Example of Death’s Perception, Bereavement and Mourning // Journal of Science & Popular Culture. 2018. Vol. 1, № 2. P. 171– 175. DOI: 10.1386/jspc.1.2.171_3.
47. Daniel E. S., Westerman D. K. Valar Morghulis (All Parasocial Men Must Die): Having Nonfictional Responses to a Fictional Character // Communication Research Reports. 2017. Vol. 34, № 2. P. 143–152. DOI: 10.1080/08824096.2017.1285757.
48. Gamba F. Faire le deuil par l’image: Les idiographies rituelles de commémoration sur YouTube // Revue des sciences sociales. 2015. № 54. P. 72–79. DOI: 10.4000/revss.2311.
49. Maddrell A. Online Memorials: The Virtual as the New Vernacular // Bereavement Care. 2012. Vol. 31, № 2. P. 46–54. DOI: 10.1080/02682621.2012.710491.
50. Robinson C., Pond D. R. Do Online Support Groups for Grief Benefit the Bereaved? Systematic Review of the Quantitative and Qualitative Literature // Computers in Human Behavior. 2019. Vol. 100. P. 48–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.011.
51. Marwick A., Ellison N. B. ‘There Isn’t Wifi in Heaven!’ Negotiating Visibility on Facebook1 Memorial Pages // Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2012. Vol. 56, № 3. P. 378–400. DOI: 10.1080/08838151.2012.705197.
52. Nansen B., Kohn T., Arnold M., Van Ryn L., Gibbs M. Social Media in the Funeral Industry: On the Digitization of Grief // Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2017. Vol. 61, № 1. P. 73–89. DOI: 10.1080/08838151.2016.1273925.
53. Öhman C., Floridi L. The Political Economy of Death in the Age of Information: A Critical Approach to the Digital Afterlife Industry // Minds and Machines. 2017. Vol. 27, № 4. P. 639–662. DOI: 10.1007/s11023-017-9445-2.
54. Field D. Palliative Medicine and the Medicalization of Death // European Journal of Cancer Care. 1994. Vol. 3, № 2. P. 58–62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.1994.tb00014.x.
55. Northcott H. C., Wilson D. M. Dying and Death in Canada. Ontario: University of Toronto Press, 2017. 336 р. ISBN 978-1442634565.
56. Moore J. Being There: Technology at the End of Life // Dying, Death and Grief in an Online Universe / Eds. C. J. Sofka, I. C. Noppe, K. R. Gilbert. New York: Springer, 2012. P. 78–87.
57. Neimeyer R. A., Noppe-Brandon G. Attachment at Distance: Grief Therapy in the Virtual World // Dying, Death and Grief in an Online Universe / Eds. C. J. Sofka, I. C. Noppe, K. R. Gilbert. New York: Springer, 2012. P. 103–118.
58. Li J., Chen S. A New Model of Social Support in Bereavement (SSB): An Empirical Investigation with a Chinese Sample // Death Studies. 2016. Vol. 40, № 4. P. 223–228. DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2015.1127296.
59. Aoun S. M., Breen L. J., Howting D. A., Rumbold B., McNamara B., Hegney D. Who Needs Bereavement Support? A Population Based Survey of Bereavement Risk and Support Need // PLoS One. 2015. Vol. 10, № 3. P. 1–14. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121101.
60. Noppe I. N., Sofka C. J., Gilbert K. R. Death Education // Dying, Death and Grief in an Online Universe // Eds. C. J. Sofka, I. C. Noppe, K. R. Gilbert. New York: Springer, 2012. P. 163–182.
61. Bryant M. Grieving with Buffy 20 Years On // British Journal of General Practice. 2017. Vol. 67, № 658. 222. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X690701.
62. Myrick J. G., Noar S. M., Willoughby J. F., Brown J. Public Reaction to the Death of Steve Jobs: Implications for Cancer Communication // Journal of Health Communication. 2014. Vol. 19, № 11. P. 1278–1295. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.872729.
63. Brown W. J., Basil M. D., Bocarnea M. C. Social Influence of an International Celebrity: Responses to the Death of Princess Diana // Journal of Communication. 2003. Vol. 53, № 4. P. 587– 605. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02912.x.
64. Mundt M., Ross K., Burnett C. M. Scaling Social Movements Through Social Media: The Case of Black Lives Matter // Social Media + Society. 2018. Vol. 4, № 4. DOI: 10.1177/2056305118807911.
65. Kates S., Terechshenko Z., Linder F., Nagler J., Bonneau R., Vakilifathi M., Tucker J. A. Online Issue Politicization: How the Common Core and Black Lives Matter Discussions Evolved on Social Media // Center for Social Media and Politics. 2020. URL: https://csmapnyu.org/assets/publications/2020_09_04_CC_BLM_Evolved.pdf (дата обращения: 10.10.2024).
66. Cumiskey K. M., Hjorth L. ‘I Wish They Could Have Answered Their Phones’: Mobile Communication in Mass Shootings // Death Studies. 2019. Vol. 43, № 7. P. 414–425. DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2018.1541940.
67. Robinson L., Cotten S. R., Ono H., Quan-Haase A., Mesch G., Chen W., Schulz J., Hale T. M., Stern M. J. Digital Inequalities and Why They Matter // Information, Communication & Society. 2015. Vol. 18, № 5. P. 569–582. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532.
68. Whitehead L. C. Methodological and Ethical Issues in Internet-Mediated Research in the Field of Health: An Integrated Review of the Literature // Social Science & Medicine. 2007. Vol. 65, № 4. P. 782–791. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.005.
69. Moreno M. A., Goniu N., Moreno P. S., Diekema D. Ethics of Social Media Research: Common Concerns and Practical Considerations // Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2013. Vol. 16, № 9. P. 708–713. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0334.
70. Tasse A. M. The Return of Results of Deceased Research Participants // Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. 2011. Vol. 39, № 4. P. 621–630. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00629.x.
71. Breen L. J., Kawashima D., Joy K., Cadell S., Roth D., Chow A., Macdonald M. E. Grief Literacy: A Call to Action for Compassionate Communities // Death Studies. 2022. Vol. 46, № 2. DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2020.1739780.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Бонойер Э., Гиттон М. Кибертанатология: за пределами смерти в цифровую эпоху. Омский научный вестник. Серия "Общество. История. Современность". 2025;10(1):80-94. https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2025-10-1-80-94
For citation:
Beaunoyer E., Guitton M.J. Cyberthanathology: death and beyond in the digital age. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2025;10(1):80-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2025-10-1-80-94
Просмотров:
4
JATS XML
Послать статью по эл. почте 