Approbation of the mechanism of economic reliability on the example of an industrial enterprise

The article considers the operation of the cascade model of the mechanism of economic reliability based on the process-technological approach. To analyze the current state of an industrial enterprise, a generalized indicator of the level of economic reliability in dynamics over six years has been established using the desirability function. Absolute indicators for the main processes of an industrial enterprise have been translated into dimensionless ones, and partial indicators of desirability have been found. Comparing the level of economic reliability with the estimates of the Harrington desirability scale meets the requirements of finding a generalized economic reliability function with a set of criteria indicators. An analysis of the potential level of economic reliability was also carried out and compared with the actual level of economic reliability. The analysis of the level of organization of ensuring economic reliability by organizational-managerial and production technological modules revealed the bottlenecks of an industrial enterprise.

The purpose of the work is to test the mechanism of economic reliability on the example of an industrial enterprise. The result of the developed methodology is the formation of a mechanism of economic reliability based on the process technological approach and the introduction of this mechanism into the economic activity of an industrial enterprise.

The results obtained can be applied at industrial enterprises of any scale of production and organizational and legal form in the conditions of modern technological dynamics to increase the level of economic reliability.

The author of the article came to the following conclusions: the implemented mechanism of economic reliability in the activity of an industrial enterprise allows identifying bottlenecks, as well as developing measures to eliminate them, thereby increasing the level of economic reliability; the action of this mechanism should be continuous, since the intensification of technological dynamics is an aggressive factor influencing the efficiency, stability and sustainability of the functioning of an industrial enterprise.

The methodological basis of the study was made up of general scientific methods of classification, generalization, comparison, analysis.

1. Yakovleva E. V., Terentyeva A. R. Formirovaniye podkhoda k issledovaniyu ekonomicheskoy nadezhnosti intellektual’noy infrastruktury tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya promyshlennykh predpriyatiy [Formation of approach to research of economic reliability of intellectual infrastructure of technological development of industrial enterprises] // Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik. Seriya Obshchestvo. Istoriya. Sovremennost’. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2020. Vol. 5, no. 3. P. 122–128. DOI: 10.25206/2542-0488-2020-5-3-122-128. (In Russ.).

2. Gritsunova S. V., Sedykh Yu. A., Vysotskaya T. A. Tsifrovizatsiya i eyë vliyaniye na biznes-protsessy predprinimatel’skikh struktur [Digitalization and its impact on business processes of business structures ] // Vestnik Altayskoy akademii ekonomiki i prava. Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law. 2019. No. 10-1. P. 34–38. (In Russ.).

3. Mutalimov V. A. Sovershenstvovaniye mekhanizma konkurentsii v usloviyakh globalizatsii [Improving the mechanism of competition under of globalisation] // Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Obshchestvennyye nauki. Herald of Dagestan State University Series 3. Social Sciences. 2018. Vol. 33, no. 2. P. 27–31. (In Russ.).

4. Frolov I. E. Uslozhneniye global’noy ekonomiki, krizis i innovatsionnaya pauza [The increasing complexity of the global economy, the crisis and the innovation pause] // Kondrat’yevskiye volny. Kondratieff Waves. 2018. No. 6. P. 127–154. (In Russ.).

5. Kepp N. V. Podryvnyye i podderzhivayushchiye innovatsii: sushchnost’, osobennosti, tendentsii razvitiya [Disruptive and sustaining innovations: essentials, details, development trend ] // Organizator proizvodstva. Organizer of Production. 2018. Vol. 26, no. 2. P. 41–52. DOI: 10.25065/1810-4894-2018-26-2-41-52. (In Russ.).

6. Terentyeva A. R. Upravleniye promyshlennym predpriyatiyem na baze mekhanizma ekonomicheskoy nadezhnosti kak osnova strategii ustoychivogo razvitiya v usloviyakh sovremennoy tekhnologicheskoy dinamiki [Management of an industrial enterprise on t basis of an economic reliability mechanism as basis for a sustainable development strategy in context of modern technological dynamics] // Upravleniye innovatsionnymi i investitsionnymi protsessami i izmeneniyami v usloviyakh tsifrovoy ekonomiki. Managing Innovation, Investment and Change in the Digital Economy. 2021. P. 333–340. (In Russ.).

7. Egorov V. N., Korovin D. I. Funktsional’nyy podkhod k izucheniyu ekonomicheskikh problem nadezhnosti proizvodstva [A functional approach to a study of economic problems of production reliability] // Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo. Personality. Culture. Society. 2003. Vol. 5, no. 3-4 (17-18). P. 9–28. (In Russ.).

8. Porter M. E. The five competitive forces that shape strategy // Harvard Business Review. 2008. Vol. 86 (1). P. 78–93. (In Engl.).

9. Ismagilova R. Sh., Timofeyev R. A. Povysheniye konkurentosposobnosti predpriyatiy [Improving the competitiveness of enterprises] // Teoreticheskiye i prikladnyye voprosy ekonomiki, upravleniya i obrazovaniya. Theoretical and Applied Issues of Economics, Management and Education. 2022. P. 175–178. (In Russ.).

10. Merkulova E. Yu., Smirnov D. A. Innovatsii kak sredstvo povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti predpriyatiya [Innovation as a means of increasing enterprise competitiveness] // Teoriya i praktika upravleniya sotsial’no-ekonomicheskimi sistemami. Theory and Practice of Managing Socio-Economic Systems. 2019. P. 218–223. (In Russ.).

11. Bjorn A. Business process improvement toolbox. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: ASQ Quality Press, 2007. 312 p. (In Engl.).

12. Hammer M., Champy J. Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. New York: NY Harper Business, 2007. 272 p. (In Engl.).

13. Scheer A-W. Industrie 4.0 — Wie sehen Produktionsprozesse im Jahr 2020 aus? Saarbrücken: IMC AG, 2013. 76 s. (In Germ.)

14. Dykman E. S. Protsessnyy podkhod kak reshayushchiy faktor pri tsifrovoy transformatsii predpriyatiya [The process approach as a decisive factor in digital enterprise transformation] // Aktual’nyye problemy ekonomiki i menedzhmenta [Current Economic and Management Problems]. 2019. No. 1 (21). P. 37–44. (In Russ.).