Punish no clone
https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2023-8-3-95-101
EDN: PYOKKC
Abstract
This article is a commentary and supplementary study to the Russian translation of Mark Walker’s article «Branching Is Not a Bug; It’s a Feature: Personal Identity and Legal (and Moral) Responsibility» published in this journal. The article discusses the difficulties that type/token theory encounters when analyzing cases of the existence of art objects and persons over time. An alternative solution, based on the ideas of Derek Parfit, is proposed.
About the Author
R. L. Kochnev
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
KOCHNEV Roman Leonidovich, Candidate of
Philosophical Sciences, Senior Lecturer of Philosophy
Department
Tyumen
References
1. Locke J. Opyt o chelovecheskom razumenii. Sochineniya v 3 t. [An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Works in 3 vols.]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 1985. Vol. 1. P. 78–620. (In Russ.).
2. Parfit D. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984. 560 p. DOI: 10.2307/2107444. (In Engl.).
3. Lewis D. Survival and Identity. In 2 vols. // Philosophical Papers. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983. Vol. 1. P. 55– 72. (In Engl.).
4. Socher D. A Copy of a Book Is Not a Token of a Type // The Journal of Aesthetic Education. 2010. Vol. 44, no. 3. P. 23–28. DOI: 10.5406/jaesteduc.44.3.0023. (In Engl.).
5. Weh M. Production Determines Category: An Ontology of Art // The Journal of Aesthetic Education. 2010. Vol. 44, no. 1 P. 84–99. DOI: 10.5406/jaesteduc.44.1.0084. (In Engl.).
6. Truncellito D. Which Type Is Tokened by a Token of a Word-Type? // Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic. 2000. Vol. 97, no. 3. P. 251–266. (In Engl.).
7. Majeed R. Ot zombi iskusstva k mërtvomu iskusstvu [From Zombie Art to Dead Art] / trans. from Engl. A. V. Kirichenko // Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik. Ser. Obshchestvo. Istoriya. Sovremennost’. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2017. No. 3. P. 64–69. (In Russ.).
8. Margolis J. The Ontological Peculiarity of Works of Art // The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 1977. Vol. 36, no. 1. P. 45–50. DOI: 10.2307/430748. (In Engl.).
9. Jacquette D. The Type-Token Distinction in Margolis’s Aesthetics // The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 1994. Vol. 52, no. 3. P. 299–307. DOI: 10.2307/431429. (In Engl.).
10. Walker M. Personal Identity and Uploading // Journal of Evolution and Technology. 2011. Vol. 22, Issue 1. P. 37–51. (In Engl.).
11. Sekatskaya M. A. Peresadka mozga i tozhdestvo lichnosti: al’ternativnaya interpretatsiya odnogo myslennogo eksperimenta [Brain transplantation and personal identity: an alternative interpretation of one thought experiment] // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2014. Vol. 42, Issue 4. P. 67–76. DOI: 10.5840/eps20144247. (In Russ.).
12. Perry J. Can The Self Divide? // Journal of Philosophy. 1972. Vol. 69. P. 463–488. DOI: 10.2307/2025324. (In Engl.).
13. Swinburne R. Mind, Brain, and Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 242 p. (In Engl.).
14. Lukas J. Meier. Can thought experiments solve problems of personal identity? // Synthese. 2022. Vol. 200, no. 3. P. 1–23. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-022-03637-7. (In Engl.).
15. Edwards J. R., Simester A. P. Prevention with a Moral Voice // Liberal Criminal Theory: Essays for Andreas von Hirsch. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014. P. 43–66. DOI: 10.5040/9781474200868. ch-003. (In Engl.).
16. Hoskins Z. Deterrent Punishment and Respect for Persons // Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law. 2011. Vol. 8. P. 369–384. (In Engl.).
17. Cerullo M. Uploading and Branching Identity // Minds & Machines. Vol. 25. 2015. P. 17–36. DOI: 10.1007/s11023-014- 9352-8. (In Engl.).
18. Weaver S., Turri J. Personal identity and persisting as many // Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Vol. 2. P. 213–242. (In Engl.).
19. Shoemaker S. Persons and Their Pasts // American Philosophical Quarterly. 1970. Vol. 7, no. 4. P. 269–285. (In Engl.).
20. Roache R. A Defence of Quasi-Memory // Philosophy. 2006. Vol. 81, no. 316. P. 323–355. DOI: 10.2307/4127438. (In Engl.).
21. Parfit D. Tozhdestvo lichnosti [Personal Identity] / trans. from Engl. R. L. Kochnev // Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik. Ser. Obshchestvo. Istoriya. Sovremennost’. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2019. Vol. 4, no. 2. P. 94–107. DOI: 10.25206/2542-0488-2019-4-2-94-107. (In Russ.).
22. Klein S. B., Nichols S. Memory and the Sense of Personal Identity // Mind. Vol. 121, no. 483. 2012. P. 677–702. DOI: 10.2307/23321780. (In Engl.).
23. Wiland E. Personal Identity and Quasi-Responsibility // Moral Responsibility and Ontology. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000. P. 77–87. (In Engl.).
24. Baber H. Counterpart Theories: The Argument from Concern // Metaphysica. Vol. 22, no. 1. 2021. P.15–22. DOI: 10.1515/mp-2021-2020. (In Engl.).
25. Rossiyskaya Federatsiya. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 30.11.1994. Stat’ya 323 [Russian Federation. Civil Code of the Russian Federation dated November 30, 1994. Article 323]. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_5142/724715f91f9e32d0f82b6ecd4e3556448270a0c2/ (accessed: 31.05.2023). (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kochnev R.L. Punish no clone. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2023;8(3):95-101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2023-8-3-95-101. EDN: PYOKKC
Views:
3
JATS XML
Email this article 