C. McGINN. Selfish genes and moral parasites
https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2023-8-1-127-135
Abstract
The essay raises questions about the origins of altruistic behaviour. A proper understanding of such behaviours must take into account the evidence of our best biological theories, which indicate that in the animal world (including Homo Sapiens Sapiens) there is no place for genuine altruism. What we often mistakenly call ‘altruism’ is the result of selfish genes.
About the Author
A. V. NekhaevRussian Federation
NEKHAEV Andrei Viktorovich, Doctor of Philosophical
Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of History,
Philosophy and Social Communications Department; Professor of Philosophy Department; Research Associate of the Laboratory of Logical and Philosophical Studies
AuthorID (RSCI): 394939;
AuthorID (SCOPUS): 57211853279;
ResearcherID: M-7208-2016;
Omsk
References
1. Trivers R. L. The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism // The Quarterly Review of Biology. 1971. Vol. 46, no. 1. P. 35–57. DOI: 10.1086/406755. (In Engl.).
2. Sober E., Wilson D. S. Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998. 394 p. (In Engl.).
3. West S. A., Griffin A. S., Gardner A. Social Semantics: Altruism, Cooperation, Mutualism, Strong Reciprocity and Group Selection // Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2007. Vol. 20, no. 2. P. 415–432. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01258.x. (In Engl.).
4. Osiński J. Kin Altruism, Reciprocal Altruism and Social Discounting // Personality and Individual Differences. 2009. Vol. 47, no. 4. P. 374–378. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.011. (In Engl.).
5. Segerstrale U. Sociobiology, History of // The Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Biology Vol. 4. / Ed. R. M. Kliman. New York: Academic Press, Elsevier, 2016. P. 140–148. (In Engl.).
6. Hamilton W. D. The Evolution of Altruistic Behavior // The American Naturalist. 1963. Vol. 97, no. 896. P. 354–356. DOI: 10.1086/497114. (In Engl.).
7. Hamilton W. D. The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour. I // Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1964. Vol. 7, no. 1. P. 1–16. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4. (In Engl.).
8. Hamilton W. D. The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour. II // Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1964. Vol. 7, no. 1. P. 17–52. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6. (In Engl.).
9. Smith J. M. Group Selection and Kin Selection // Nature. 1964. Vol. 201, no. 4924. P. 1145–1147. DOI: 10.1038/2011145a0. (In Engl.).
10. Foster K. R., Wenseleers T., Ratnieks F. L. W. Kin Selection is the Key to Altruism // Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2006. Vol. 21, no. 2. P. 57–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.020. (In Engl.).
11. Birch J., Okasha S. Kin Selection and Its Critics // BioScience. 2015. Vol. 65, no. 1. P. 22–32. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biu196. (In Engl.).
12. Williams G. C. Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966. 307 p. (In Engl.).
13. Dawkins R. The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976. 224 p. (In Engl.).
14. Dawkins R. The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982. 307 p. (In Engl.).
Review
For citations:
Nekhaev A.V. C. McGINN. Selfish genes and moral parasites. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2023;8(1):127-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2023-8-1-127-135
JATS XML




















