Preview

Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity

Advanced search

A Deontological Theodicy / trans. from Engl. V. A. Sergeeva

С. McGinn

Trans. from Engl. SERGEEVA Varvara Alexandrovna, Senior Lecturer of the Philosophy Department of the Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities, Tyumen State University,

https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2023-8-3-67-72

EDN: QOINYM

Abstract

The essay examines the inconsistence problem of the existence a perfect God and evil in the world. It contains criticism of the traditional view that the concept of God as a morally perfect entity is paradoxical. Essay is demonstrated that such views are based on an extreme form of utilitarianism. It is argued that the idea of God and evil coexisting in the world is not inconsistent if we accept the deontological view in ethics that the general obligation to eliminate suffering wherever it occurs cannot be one’s moral duty.

It is proved that the idea of the coexistence of God and evil in the world does not contain a contradiction if we accept the deontological point of view in ethics that the obligation to eliminate suffering wherever it occurs cannot be anyone’s moral duty. 

About the Author

С. McGinn
Jesus College, University of Oxford
United Kingdom

Oxford



References

1. St. Anselm’s Proslogion / transl. from Latin M. J. Charlesworth. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1979. 196 p. (In Engl.).

2. Plantinga A. The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974. 256 p. (In Engl.).

3. Malcolm N. Anselm’s Ontological Arguments // The Philosophical Review. 1960. Vol. 69, no. 1. P. 41-62. DOI: 10.2307/2182266. (In Engl.).

4. Davies B. Anselm and the Ontological Argument // The Cambridge Companion to Anselm / Eds. B. Davies, B. Leftow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. P. 157–178. (In Engl.).

5. Inwagen P. Ontological Arguments // Noûs. 1977. Vol. 11, no. 4. P. 375–395. DOI: 10.2307/2214562. (In Engl.).

6. Oppy G. Ontological Arguments and Belief in God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. 376 p. (In Engl.).

7. Leftow B. The Ontological Argument // The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion / Ed. W. Wainwright. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. P. 80–115. (In Engl.).

8. Lowe E. J. The Ontological Argument // The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion / Eds. C. Meister, P. Copan. London: Routledge, 2007. P. 391–400. (In Engl.).

9. Ontological Arguments / Ed. G. Oppy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. 284 p. (In Engl.).


Review

For citations:


McGinn С. A Deontological Theodicy / trans. from Engl. V. A. Sergeeva. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2023;8(3):67-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2023-8-3-67-72. EDN: QOINYM

Views: 0

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0488 (Print)
ISSN 2541-7983 (Online)