Renovation and mereorganic continuity
https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2025-10-1-95-103
Abstract
The author clarifies nature of the property of merorganic continuity and demonstrates its applicability not only to the question of survival and personal identity, but also to the question of demarcation of reconstruction and restoration. The author also responds to the remarks and criticisms of Roman Kochnev and Konstantin Morozov related to the publication of his previous article.
About the Author
A. M. Kardash
Institute of Philosophy, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus
Belarus
Kardash Aleksey Mikhaylovich, Graduate Student of the Theory of Cognition and Methodology of Science Department, Institute of Philosophy
Minsk
AuthorlD (RSCI): 1145532
ResearcherlD: AGN-9675-2022
References
1. Nozick R. Fiction. Ploughshares. 1980. Vol. 6, no. 3. P. 74–78. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40348521 (accessed: 28.07.2024). (In Engl.).
2. Merleau-Ponty M. Somneniya Sezanna [Cezanne’s doubts] // (Post)fenomenologiya: novaya fenomenologiya vo Frantsii i za eye predelami. (Post)Phenomenology: a New phenomenology in France and beyond / comp.: S. Sholokhova, A. Yampolskaya. Moscow, 2014. P. 102–118. EDN: SFGEND. (In Russ.).
3. Nozick R. Anarkhiya, gosudarstvo i utopiya / trans. from Engl. by B. Pinsker; ed. by Yu. Kuznetsov, A. Kuryayev. Moscow, 2008. 424 p. (In Russ.).
4. Kardash A. M. Teleport i origami [Teletransporter and Origami]. Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik. Ser. Obshchestvo. Istoriya. Sovremennost’. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2024. Vol. 9, no. 1. P. 102–107. DOI: 10.25206/2542-0488-2024-9-1-102-107. EDN: LQDSOS. (In Russ.)
5. Kochnev R. L. Teleport i drugie nepriyatnosti [Teletransporter and Other Troubles]. Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik. Ser. Obshchestvo. Istoriya. Sovremennost’. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2024. Vol. 9, no. 2. P. 106–111. DOI: 10.25206/2542-0488-2024-9-2-106-111. EDN: EGQNVC. (In Russ.).
6. Morozov K. E. Ukradennyye gamety i mereorganicheskaya preyemstvennost’ [Stolen gametes and mereorganic continuity]. Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik. Ser. Obshchestvo. Istoriya. Sovremennost’. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2024. Vol. 9, no. 2. P. 106–111. DOI: 10.25206/2542-0488-2024-9-2-106-111. EDN: OKVBBV. (In Russ.).
7. Gheaus A. Biological Parenthood: Gestational, Not Genetic. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 2017. Vol. 96, no. 2. P. 225–249. DOI: 10.1080/00048402.2017.1354389. (In Engl.).
8. Kochnev R. L. Teleportatsiya Parfita ili rabota nad oshibkami [Parfitian Teleportation or Error Managemen]. Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik. Ser. Obshchestvo. Istoriya. Sovremennost’. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2024. Vol. 9, no. 2. P. 106–111. DOI: 10.25206/2542-0488-2024-9-2-106-111. EDN: XGEHCJ. (In Russ.).
9. Hidalgo J. Vyzhivaniye pri teleportatsii [You Survive Teletransportation] / trans. from Engl. by A. V. Nekhaev. Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik. Ser. Obshchestvo. Istoriya. Sovremennost’. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2024. Vol. 9, no. 1. P. 97–101. DOI: 10.25206/2542-0488-2024-9-1-97-101. EDN: RAUEJE. (In Russ.).
10. Scott David A. Art Restoration and Its Contextualization. Journal of Aesthetic Education. 2017. Vol. 51, no. 2. P. 82–104. DOI: 10.5406/jaesteduc.51.2.0082.11. (In Engl.).
11. Wreen M. The Restoration and Reproduction of Works of Art. Dialogue. 1985. Vol. 24, no. 1. P. 91–100. DOI: 10.1017/S001221730004600X. (In Engl.).
12. De Clercq R. The Metaphysics of Art Restoration. British Journal of Aesthetics. 2013. Vol. 53, no. 3. P. 261–275. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayt013. (In Engl.).
13. Sagoff M. On Restoring and Reproducing Art. Journal of Philosophy. 1978. Vol. 75, no. 9. P. 453–470. DOI: 10.2307/2025386. (In Engl.).
14. Wollheim R. Art and Its Objects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980. 288 p. (In Engl.).
15. Budd M. The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature: Essays on the Aesthetics of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 172 p. (In Engl.).
16. Savile A. The Rationale of Restoration. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 1993. Vol. 51, no. 3. P. 463–474. (In Engl.).
17. Lamarque P. Work and Object: Explorations in the Metaphysics of Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. 264 p. (In Engl.).
18. Sosa E. Surviving Matters. Noûs. 1990. Vol. 24, no. 2. P. 297–322. DOI: 10.2307/2215530. (In Engl.).
Review
For citations:
Kardash A.M. Renovation and mereorganic continuity. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2025;10(1):95-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2025-10-1-95-103
Views:
5
JATS XML
Email this article 