Preview

Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity

Advanced search

Absurd Utilitarianism

С. McGinn

Translated from A.V.English Nekhaev, Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor Omsk State Technical University

https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2024-9-1-85-89

EDN: REEWIV

Abstract

The essay contains a radical critique of the total act utilitarianism. The consistent implementation principle of aggregate utility maximization suggests that the best world what we can create (with a given amount of resource R) would be a world with countless rat brains in vats converted into solid pleasure centers.

About the Author

С. McGinn
Jesus College, University of Oxford
United Kingdom

Oxford



References

1. Parfit D. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986. 560 p. (In Engl.).

2. Anglin B. The Repugnant Conclusion // Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 1977. Vol. 7, no. 4. P. 745–754. DOI: 10.1080/00455091.1977.10716193. (In Engl.).

3. Hurka T. M. Average Utilitarianisms // Analysis. 1982. Vol. 42, no. 2. P. 65–69. DOI: 10.1093/analys/42.2.65. (In Engl.).

4. Parfit D. Overpopulation and the Quality of Life // Applied Ethics / Ed. P. Singer. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 145– 164. (In Engl.).

5. Dasgupta P., Seabright P. Population Size and the Quality of Life // Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 1989. Vol. 63, no. 1. P. 23–54. DOI: 10.1093/aristoteliansupp/63.1.23. (In Engl.).

6. Sider T. Might Theory X Be a Theory of Diminishing Marginal Value? // Analysis. 1991. Vol. 51, no. 4. P. 265–271. DOI: 10.1093/analys/51.4.265. (In Engl.).

7. Crisp R. Utilitarianism and the Life of Virtue // The Philosophical Quarterly. 1992. Vol. 42, no. 167. P. 139–160. DOI: 10.2307/2220212. (In Engl.).

8. Feldman F. Justice, Desert, and the Repugnant Conclusion // Utilitas. 1995. Vol. 7, no. 2. P. 189–206. DOI: 10.1017/S095382080000203X. (In Engl.).

9. Ryberg J. Parfit’s Repugnant Conclusion // The Philosophical Quarterly. 1996. Vol. 46, no. 183. P. 202–213. DOI: 10.2307/2956387. (In Engl.).

10. Fotion N. Repugnant Thoughts about the Repugnant Conclusion Argument // Contingent Future Persons: On the Ethics of Deciding Who Will Live, or Not, in the Future / Eds. N. Fotion, J. C. Heller. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media, 1997. P. 85–97. (In Engl.).

11. Carlson Е. Mere Addition and Two Trilemmas of Population Ethics // Economics and Philosophy. 1998. Vol. 14, no. 2. P. 283–306. DOI: 10.1017/S0266267100003862. (In Engl.).

12. Arrhenius G. An Impossibility Theorem for Welfarist Axiologies // Economics and Philosophy. 2000. Vol. 16, no. 2. P. 247–266. DOI: 10.1017/S0266267100000249. (In Engl.).

13. Tännsjö T. Why We Ought to Accept the Repugnant Conclusion // Utilitas. 2002. Vol. 14, no. 3. P. 339–359. DOI: 10.1017/S0953820800003642. (In Engl.).

14. Mulgan T. The Reverse Repugnant Conclusion // Utilitas. 2002. Vol. 14, no. 3. P. 360–364. DOI: 10.1017/S0953820800003654. (In Engl.).

15. The Repugnant Conclusion / Eds. J. Ryberg, T. Tännsjö. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004. 260 p. (In Engl.).

16. Broome J. Weighing Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. 278 p. (In Engl.).

17. Huemer M. In Defence of Repugnance // Mind. 2008. Vol. 117, no. 468. P. 899–933. DOI: 10.1093/mind/fzn079. (In Engl.).

18. Masny M. On Parfit’s Wide Dual Person-Affecting Principle// The Philosophical Quarterly. 2020. Vol. 70, no. 278. P. 114–139. DOI: 10.1093/pq/pqz049. (In Engl.).

19. Beard S. Perfectionism and the Repugnant Conclusion // The Journal of Value Inquiry. 2020. Vol. 54, no. 1. P. 119–140. DOI: 10.1007/s10790-019-09687-4. (In Engl.).

20. Jensen K. K. Weak Superiority, Imprecise Equality and the Repugnant Conclusion // Utilitas. 2020. Vol. 32, no. 3. P. 294–315. DOI: 10.1017/S0953820819000517. (In Engl.).

21. Spears D., Budolfson M. Repugnant Conclusions // Social Choice and Welfare. 2021. Vol. 57, no. 3. P. 567–588. DOI: 10.1007/s00355-021-01321-2. (In Engl.).

22. Zuber S., Venkatesh N., Tännsjö T. [et al.] What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion? // Utilitas. 2021. Vol. 33, no. 4. P. 379–383. DOI: 10.1017/S095382082100011X. (In Engl.).


Review

For citations:


McGinn С. Absurd Utilitarianism. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2024;9(1):85-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2024-9-1-85-89. EDN: REEWIV

Views: 5

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0488 (Print)
ISSN 2541-7983 (Online)