Do androids dream of autobiography?
https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2023-8-2-116-120
Abstract
The modern development of ideas and technologies of artificial intelligence adds practical significance to philosophical debates concerning questions of identity and personal identity. The aim of this article is to demonstrate the advantage of the narrative approach for describing the identity of cybernetic organisms. For this purpose, a mental experiment is formulated to download the consciousness of a scientist into the body of an android. At the end of the article the author discusses a potential hierarchy of narrative criteria.
About the Author
A. D. BlizhenskiyRussian Federation
BLIZHENSKIY Aleksandr Dmitriyevich, Student of «Journalism: Journalism in a Digital Society: Author and Editorial Work» Faculty, Social Sciences and Humanities Institute
Tyumen
References
1. Dennet S. D. Pochemu kazhdyy iz nas yavlyayetsya novellistom [Why everyone is a novelist // Voprosy filosofii. Philosophy Issues. 2003. No. 2. P. 121–130. (In Russ.).
2. Licon J. A. Properly functioning brains and personal identity: an argument for neural animalism // SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy. 2013. Vol. 14, Issue 1. P. 63–69. DOI: 10.1515/sats-2013-0004. (In Engl.).
3. Sharpe K. W. Animalism and person essentialism // Metaphysica. 2015. Vol. 16, Issue 1. P. 53–72. DOI: 10.1515/mp-2015-0003. (In Engl.).
4. Loginov E. V, Mertsalov A. V, Salin A. S [et al.]. Prolegomeny k probleme tozhdestva lichnosti [Prolegomena to personal identity problem] // Finikovyy kompot. Date Palm Compote. 2018. No. 13. P. 6–40. DOI: 10.24411/2587-9308-2018-00001. (In Russ.).
5. Volkov D. B. Narrativnyy podkhod kak resheniye problemy tozhdestva [Narrative approach as the solution to the personal identity problem] // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 17. Filosofiya. Konfliktologiya. Kul’turologiya. Religiovedeniye. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 17. Philosophy. Conflict Studies. Culture Studies. Religious Studies. 2016. No. 4. P. 21–32. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu17.2016.403. (In Russ.).
6. Parfit D. Tozhdestvo lichnosti [Personal identity] / trans. from Engl. R. L. Kochnev // Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik. Ser. Obshchestvo. Istoriya. Sovremennost’. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2019. Vol. 4, no. 2. P. 94–107. DOI: 10.25206/2542-0488-2019-4-2-94-107. (In Russ.).
7. Locke J. Opyt o chelovecheskom razumenii [An essay concerning human understanding] // Sochineniya. V 3 t. [Works. In 3 vols.]. Moscow, 1985. Vol. 1. P. 78–620. (In Russ.).
8. Levin S. M. Narrativnyy podkhod: fiktsiya i real’nost’ [Narrative identity: fiction and reality] // Filosofskiy zhurnal. The Philosophy Journal. 2018. Vol. 11, no. 3. P. 184–187. DOI: 10.21146/2072-0726-2018-11-3-184-187. (In Russ.).
9. Volkov D. B. Kak vyzhit’, rasskazyvaya istoriyu. Narrativnyy podkhod k probleme tozhdestva lichnosti [How to survive telling a story. narrative approach to personal identity problem] // Finikovyy Kompot. Date Palm Compote. 2018. No. 13. P. 55–59. DOI: 10.24411/2587-9308-2018-00005. (In Russ.).
10. Olson E., Witt K. Narrative and persistence // Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 2019. Vol. 49, Issue 3. P. 419–434. DOI: 10.1080/00455091.2018.1486674. (In Engl.).
11. Parfit D. My — nechelovecheskiye sushchestva [We are not human beings] / trans. from Engl. U. V. Dobronravova // Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik. Ser. Obshchestvo. Istoriya. Sovremennost’. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2020. Vol. 5, no. 4. P. 82–95. DOI: 10.25206/2542-0488-2020-5-4-82-95. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Blizhenskiy A.D. Do androids dream of autobiography? Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity. 2023;8(2):116-120. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2023-8-2-116-120
JATS XML



















